Justice Thomas Questions Legality of Jack Smith's Appointment in Potential Roadmap for Judge Cannon
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion to Monday's Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity questioning the constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment, suggesting not only is the office invalid but Smith cannot legally hold it.
8 across the spectrum · tap a section to jump
Left
0 viewpointsNo Left coverage yet.
A blind spot on this side of the story.
Center
1 viewpointRight
7 viewpointsJustice Thomas wants to know if Jack Smith is constitutionally appointed
Justice Thomas Questions Legality of Jack Smith's Appointment in Potential Roadmap for Judge Cannon
Justice Thomas Raises Serious Questions About the Constitutionality of Jack Smith’s Appointment in the Presidential Immunity case.
Clarence Thomas swipes at Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment in SCOTUS immunity case