Federal judge rules warrantless Flock camera searches may violate 4th Amendment

A federal judge in Oklahoma ruled that police use of Flock Safety's AI-powered surveillance cameras to search for suspects without a warrant may violate the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches. Flock Safety operates cameras that collect data used to identify vehicles and potentially people. The judge found that warrantless searches of this data lack the probable cause normally required by law. The ruling suggests limits on how police can use this surveillance technology going forward.

← Back to stories
National6 articles from 6 sources across the spectrum· Updated 8h ago

5 across the spectrum · tap a section to jump

The bigger story

This story is one of several related ones. Here's where it sits.

How each side is putting it

Left

0 viewpoints

No Left coverage yet.

A blind spot on this side of the story.

Center

1 viewpoint
The HillCenter· 1d ago

Federal judge rules warrantless Flock camera searches may violate 4th Amendment

Right

4 viewpoints
Ran by 2 outlets· Legitgov, Just the News
LegitgovRight· 8h ago

Federal judge rules Flock camera searches unconstitutional

Just the NewsLean Right· 1d ago

Federal judge rules Flock camera searches unconstitutional

Unmuzzled NewsRight· 17h ago

Federal Judge Just Ruled Flock Safety Cameras Watching Every American Driver Violate the Constitution

The Daily CallerRight· 18h ago

Federal Judge Rules Warrantless Flock Search Violated 4th Amendment Rights

Washington ExaminerRight· 1d ago

Judge rules Flock cameras violate the Fourth Amendment

Federal judge rules warrantless Flock camera searches may violate 4th Amendment | Slantwise